Search for: "State v. Elam" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2012, 2:29 am by sally
Regina (Elam) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 29; [2012] WLR (D) 14 “The licence expiry date applicable to a prisoner serving consecutive terms of imprisonment including at least one term of 12 months or more was to be determined by the provisions of section 264(3) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 unless all the offences for which the sentences were imposed had been committed before section 264 came into force on 4 April 2005; in such a case, section… [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 9:42 am
The following summary is by Nicole Elam, a summer associate at Akin Gump and a student at Howard Law School. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 8:45 am
The following commentary is by Nicole Elam, a student at Howard Law School and a summer associate in Akin Gump's DC office. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the ninth cause of action, alleging aiding and abetting discrimination (see Strauss v New York State Dept. of Educ., 26 AD3d 67, 73). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the ninth cause of action, alleging aiding and abetting discrimination (see Strauss v New York State Dept. of Educ., 26 AD3d 67, 73). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the ninth cause of action, alleging aiding and abetting discrimination (see Strauss v New York State Dept. of Educ., 26 AD3d 67, 73). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the ninth cause of action, alleging aiding and abetting discrimination (see Strauss v New York State Dept. of Educ., 26 AD3d 67, 73). [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 4:38 am by Charles Sartain
Co-author Carolina Cuppitelli* The question presented in Aaron v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 3:14 pm
"The 8th Circuit expressed doubts about the viability of a core operations inference in an October 2008 decision, Elam v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 10:18 pm
These Conferences brought together large numbers of Chicano youth from throughout the United States and provided them with opportunities to express their views on self-determination. [read post]