Search for: "State v. Elias"
Results 21 - 40
of 254
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2010, 1:05 pm
Elias v Spencer [2010] EWCA Civ 246 [Not on Bailii yet] This was a permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal hearing. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 6:16 am
Henderson v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:23 am
Elias LJ said that Zambrano had “removed the requirement for even an exiguous cross-border link” before the principle applied. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
On Wednesday, August 17, 2011, the Labor and Employment Law Section of the State Bar of California will present a full-day seminar entitled "Wage & Hour Class Actions After AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:00 am
Elias LJ gave the lead judgment, with which Lewison and Floyd LJJ agreed. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 8:00 am
Mendez v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:15 am
Supreme Court allows tortured Tamil asylum-seeker’s appeal KV (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] UKSC 10 (6 March 2019) In a recent judgment given by Lord Wilson the Supreme Court unanimously allowed KV’s appeal, remitting the matter to the UT for fresh determination. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 7:40 pm
PUB OCEAN LIMITEDVICTOR ELIAS PHOTOGRAPHY V. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:52 pm
Elias indicated the Clinton campaign also would file challenges in Michigan and Pennsylvania. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 11:17 am
In Henderson v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 7:15 am
Elias LJ dissented on the point, but the majority held that the UT had been entitled to reach the conclusion that it did. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 9:51 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 5:17 am
Elias LJ had been right in the present case. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 2:17 am
It approved the view of Elias LJ in the Court of Appeal, that very considerable weight should be given to the fact that injuries which are self inflicted by proxy are likely to be extremely rare. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:16 am
Lord Wilson noted that there is evidence of extensive torture by state forces in Sri Lanka at the relevant time. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 12:54 pm
Supreme Court decision stemming from Hurst v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 12:43 am
The structure of s 117B(6) is straightforward because it unambiguously states that there is no public interest in removal where a person has a genuine and subsisting parental relationship with a qualifying child and it would not be reasonable to expect the child to leave the UK. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 10:47 am
In Fasolas v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 10:47 am
In Fasolas v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 6:15 am
The Court of Appeals finds the lawsuit plausibly claims Rolling Stone libeled two students whom the article implied had raped a female classmate.The case is Elias v. [read post]
