Search for: "State v. Elias" Results 61 - 80 of 260
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2020, 8:13 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Fortunately the courts in Ontario disagree, finding in a commercial tenancy dispute in Elias Restaurant v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:57 am
 One factor was the clinical variability in any case, which was stated to allow being up to 20% off in the regime; another was the influence of the judgment of the pharmacokineticist in a field that was not slavish to calculations. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 8:58 am by Fenella Keymer, Olswang LLP
  The contract expressly stated that the relationship between the parties was that of client and independent contractor. [read post]
22 May 2012, 4:28 pm by Martin Downs
Burnton LJ does not explicitly engage with the reputation argument but states he agrees the judgment of Elias LJ who does. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 9:04 am by Madelaine Lane
State Employees’ Retirement System, Case No. 141909, back to the State Employees’ Retirement Board for reconsideration of petitioner’s request for benefits in light of Nason v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Cunningham & Ute Römer-Barron, Four Reasons the Supreme Court Should Reconsider Its Article III Standing Doctrine, (Forthcoming, Ohio State Law Journal Online, v. 85, 2024).Elias Neibart, M.A. v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 6:46 am by MBettman
Both student contributor Kristen Elia and I predicted a win for the defense. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm by Adam Wagner
RT (Zimbabwe) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 1285 (18 November 2010) – Read judgment The Court of Appeal has ruled that asylum seekers cannot be forced to lie about not holding political beliefs when returning to their home country. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Isabel McArdle
v)              Is the Secretary of State entitled to rely on the defence of act of state? [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:30 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix
On 18 February 2014, the Court of Appeal (Elias, Lewison and Floyd LJJ) allowed the appeal. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 9:08 am by Matt Sundquist
  The decision requires twenty-four states to repeal their bans on corporate and union advertising; as states repeal these laws, Baran reasoned, they might concurrently strengthen their reporting and disclosure laws. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
  The Court of Appeal (Aikens, Mummery and Elias LJJ) upheld this argument in February 2010. [read post]