Search for: "State v. Elias"
Results 161 - 180
of 258
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2015, 12:37 pm
” RBKC’s review upheld suitability, stating: “42. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 8:58 am
Elias Tesfa, FA1202001427761 (Nat. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 5:12 am
The court cited the McCann v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
(Elias Restaurant) v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 4:28 pm
One need look no further than the frequent tweets of the president of the United States to prove the point. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 5:20 am
Elias/Savion Adver., Inc., 811 A.2d 10, 14 (Pa. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:26 am
Elias and Pitchford LJJ agreed. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 11:02 pm
Elias LJ assessed the fees scheme not simply against the ECHR by also against the International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) on the basis that the Court of Human Rights has, in recent cases, considered ECHR rights in light of the provisions of the Covenant (see Demir & Baykara v Turkey (2009) at [85] and Opuz v Turkey (2010) at [185]). [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
The landowners now are Dennis Elias, Jeffrey and Janice Elias, and Arieh and Sunni Ordronneau. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 10:54 am
Steve Elias, Team Leader-Business License Research Team, Corporation Service Company [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 4:46 am
Lord Justice Lloyd and Lord Justice Elias both gave concurring judgments. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:58 am
(United States v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am
Albert Elia Bldg. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 7:56 am
Lord Justice Elias gave the lead Judgment and found in favour of Clyde & Co. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:27 am
For example, she had stated that the questioning by her lawyers "made it easy to tell them what had happened".Accordingly, the appeal turned on the "fundamental question", as Elias J. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm
R (Quila & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (Bibi & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:42 pm
He clearly understood the potential importance of considering her mental state against the background of her imprisonment in Iran. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 10:28 am
Samson v. [read post]
