Search for: "State v. English"
Results 21 - 40
of 7,257
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2022, 5:46 am
The 1897 English case of Wilkinson v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 8:59 am
: In Plain English appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:08 am
Related Musings:English v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 5:03 am
The state had recently passed a law against speaking a language other than English in school. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 5:01 am
California has reached a settlement in DJ v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 8:02 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals case on this issue, Garcia v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 7:57 am
State v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 4:55 am
The topic is timely in light of King v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 9:03 pm
This problem is especially salient for non-English speaking students studying in the United States. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:50 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 12:19 am
The brief decision is about the most recent practice direction which aligns the English Patents Court regime with the fast-approaching UPC's stated intention that all cases will be done and dusted within a year. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 6:36 am
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a new decision in Flores v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 9:32 am
On 6 October 2023, the English Court of Appeal (Court of Appeal) handed down its judgment in Mints v PJSC National Bank Trust [2023] EWCA Civ 1132. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 2:32 am
Referee Sunshine stated: “The court notes that throughout the hearing, Guliyev answered the questions in English before they were translated to him in Turkish finding that he understands the English language very well. [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 4:51 am
McKerr v United Kingdom, at para. 111). [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Some Food for Thought After Lee v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:00 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Horne v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:33 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America House of Lords “A person could not be extradited to the United States of America to stand trial on charges brought under US legislation which declared cartels to be illegal, to stand trial for price-fixing offences alleged to have been committed from 1989 to 2000 because during that period price-fixing agreements and cartels were not illegal under English law, unless there were other aggravating… [read post]
17 May 2017, 1:30 pm
The answer is an unqualified yes.In 1982, the Supreme Court decidedPlyler v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 10:00 pm
A recent judgment by the High Court of England and Wales in the case of Jamp Pharma Corp v. [read post]
