Search for: "State v. Ervin" Results 1 - 20 of 114
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2022, 7:35 am by Eve Brensike Primus
The state court had properly noted that Davenport would be entitled to relief under Chapman v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
Rees decision and approved the use of midazolam in 2015 in Glossip v. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 4:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Selvin is a partner with Los Angeles-based Ervin Cohen & Jessup. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 2:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” See, e.g., State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
In each case, I will state my position briefly; repeat the critique; and where I can, rebut it. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 1:58 pm by Sandy Levinson
, where the answer is basically because over 200 years of systematic opposition to the idiocy of that system has proved unavailing against the barriers of Article V, most dramatically in 1969, where the Senate, because of a filibuster led by white supremacists Southern senators Sam Ervin and Strom Thurmond, never voted on a proposal that had in fact gained the assent of two-thirds of the House of Representatives and perhaps would have gotten the two thirds had the Senate been… [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  This is just the way the “state unit” system works, whatever the Supreme Court had suggested in Gray v. [read post]