Search for: "State v. Estill" Results 1 - 9 of 9
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2012, 2:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Aramarine Brokerage, Inc. v Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson, P.C. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 6:24 am
As support for this conclusion, the Court referred to the plain and ordinary meaning of "complaint", how workplace safety laws have been interpreted in other states, how the federal workplace safety law has been interpreted and finally to a prior decision by the Kentucky Court of Appeals, Terminix Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 7:49 pm
 As is done in cases calling for statute interpretation, and highlighting the importance of carefully crafting groundbreaking legislation like the MMMA, the Court ultimately held that the MMMA does not govern private employment actions and noted that other states, California, Montana, and Washington have found that their states' similar medical marijuana laws do not govern private employment actions.The case is Casias v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 9:00 am
Parker    Southern District of Ohio at Dayton     NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION OPINIONS       OpinionShort Title/District 08a0580n.06 Roger Estill v. [read post]