Search for: "State v. Evans" Results 261 - 280 of 2,614
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton and Leslie C. Griffin
The patient, Evan Minton, is transgender, and a hysterectomy was denied after the Catholics found out Minton is transgender.Minton sued Dignity Health under California law. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiff alleges that on August 2, 2013, Defendant again became intoxicated, physically forced Plaintiff to leave their joint hotel room and stated that he wanted "20 men to rape" her. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 8:00 pm
v=UODUzow514MVideo Credit: Sean Evans, @evvo1991backtothemovies.com/ [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 5:45 pm by Amy Howe
The question came to the court in a case filed by a transgender patient, Evan Minton, who wanted a hysterectomy and alleges that the hospital, Mercy San Juan Medical Center in Carmichael, California, refused to allow the doctor to perform it, in violation of state civil rights laws. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
EST, the Society will host Making Minimum Wage: Elsie Parrish v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am by INFORRM
Ultimately, Evan’s concludes NFT’s value is in their uniqueness, and their “abstractly intriguing” creation. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 10:09 am by Karen Gullo
Lagleva, and Tara Evans, long-time Marin community members, in a lawsuit filed in Marin County Superior Court. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 8:40 am by INFORRM
For, as Griffiths LJ said, in Lion Laboratories v Evans [1985] QB 526, it would be necessary to demonstrate that the iniquity is such as to make it vital the confidential information is published directly to the public. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
  He is unpersuaded that the post-Shevill case law should be reversed but suggests that, in addition, a “focalisation” principle should apply, using the context of the statement in question to determine which Member State’s jurisdiction is the most appropriate. [read post]