Search for: "State v. Evergreen District Court" Results 1 - 20 of 139
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2013, 7:36 am by WIMS
(Evergreen) appealed from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts dismissing its Second Amended Complaint (complaint). [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 9:00 pm
On January 13, the Evergreen Freedom Foundation presented oral argument before the Washington Supreme Court as amicus curiae ("Friend of the Court") in the case of Cary v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 11:19 pm by Jarod Bona
In a 2013 First Circuit decision called Evergreen Partnering Group Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 11:19 pm by Jarod Bona
In a 2013 First Circuit decision called Evergreen Partnering Group Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 10:33 pm by The Clinton Law Firm
In 2004, Epicor’s predecessor in interest commenced an action against KWI and others in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (hereinafter the federal action) seeking, inter alia, to terminate the 2001 agreement due to alleged breaches by KWI. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm by Rick
One of the earliest examples — demonstrating that even the courts would only grudgingly support the will of the voters — came in the case of People v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 6:09 am by Ted Frank
Evergreen Dynasty Corp. when I talk about problems with the ADA, and regularly cite Molski v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 3:45 am
HEPPT, ESQ., 05 Civ. 9977 (RWS) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK January 16, 2008, Filed , the tide seems to be turning in favor of the defendant attorney. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 9:14 am by Sierra N. Hennessy
District Court for the Northern District of New York, seeking an injunction prohibiting the State of New York from enforcing §203-e against Evergreen, as well as a declaration that §203-e is unconstitutional. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 1:58 pm by Holly Brezee
Asbill  On July 9th, 2020, the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision in McGirt v. [read post]