Search for: "State v. Farley" Results 21 - 40 of 169
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Guest post by Jake Linford, Loula Fuller and Dan Myers Professor, Florida State University College of Law, whose trademark law scholarship I have highlighted on JotwellI want to thank Lisa Ouellette for inviting me to blog about United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Guest post by Jake Linford, Loula Fuller and Dan Myers Professor, Florida State University College of Law, whose trademark law scholarship I have highlighted on JotwellI want to thank Lisa Ouellette for inviting me to blog about United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
  We have had 460,000 page views this year, more than half from the UK with the United States, India, Australia and Ireland making up the rest of the top five. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The Tenth Circuit has not yet ruled on whether such a First Amendment right of access exists in civil cases, see United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
” In United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm by Jacques Singer-Emery
In a session cut short by a stay from the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR), the military commission in United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 6:07 am by Anushka Limaye
Benjamin Farley considered the Trump administration’s influence on Periodic Review at Guantanamo Bay. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 7:40 pm by Brian Shiffrin
” If a juror’s statements during voir dire raise a doubt about his impartiality, such as statements that he has a pre-formed opinion about the case, that juror cannot be permitted to sit unless he states unequivocally that he can be fair and decide the case solely on the evidence adduced at trial (People v Johnson, 17 NY3d 752, 753 [2011]; People v Chambers, 97 NY2d 417, 419 [2002]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358, 362-363 [2001]; People v… [read post]