Search for: "State v. Farley"
Results 21 - 40
of 169
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2020, 12:51 pm
Farley (which I had also filed) and Holmes v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 4:05 am
"Professor Farley observes that unfair competition law reached its high point in 1918 in International News Service v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 5:27 am
v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
Guest post by Jake Linford, Loula Fuller and Dan Myers Professor, Florida State University College of Law, whose trademark law scholarship I have highlighted on JotwellI want to thank Lisa Ouellette for inviting me to blog about United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:13 pm
v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 3:26 am
Farley of American University - Washington College of Law (download here)). [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 4:25 pm
We have had 460,000 page views this year, more than half from the UK with the United States, India, Australia and Ireland making up the rest of the top five. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 5:03 am
Farley, 352 F. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 12:54 pm
With a new judge presiding, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
The Tenth Circuit has not yet ruled on whether such a First Amendment right of access exists in civil cases, see United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am
” In United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:02 am
Here, Professor Farley offers her take on Iancu v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm
In a session cut short by a stay from the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR), the military commission in United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 7:16 pm
Farley, 2018 Del. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 3:11 pm
Over the week of Nov. 12, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 5:13 am
Giuffre v. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 6:07 am
Benjamin Farley considered the Trump administration’s influence on Periodic Review at Guantanamo Bay. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 6:49 am
Farley on September 28, 2018. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 7:40 pm
” If a juror’s statements during voir dire raise a doubt about his impartiality, such as statements that he has a pre-formed opinion about the case, that juror cannot be permitted to sit unless he states unequivocally that he can be fair and decide the case solely on the evidence adduced at trial (People v Johnson, 17 NY3d 752, 753 [2011]; People v Chambers, 97 NY2d 417, 419 [2002]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358, 362-363 [2001]; People v… [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 6:21 am
Last week, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
