Search for: "State v. Farmer" Results 61 - 80 of 1,487
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered its long-awaited judgment in the case of Bowman v Monsanto Co. et Al., unanimously ruling that 'patent exhaustion does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder's permission'. [read post]
17 May 2007, 8:49 pm
Matt Conigliaro recommends Judge Farmer's second opinion in Funny Cide Ventures, L.L.C. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 9:32 am by scanner1
Marriage of Farmer and Cassady DA 17-0523 2018 MT 101N Civil – Domestic Relations State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 9:53 am by Dennis Crouch
Rather, the patentee must have taken some additional step to create some threat of enforcement and here, Monsanto has only stated that it will not sue unless the farmers take advantage of the patented seeds unique properties. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 5:57 am by Mark S. Humphreys
It is a Fort Worth Court of Appeals opinion issued in 2015, styled, Texas Farmers Insurance Company and Farmers Insurance Exchange v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:48 am by UChicagoLaw
On Defining Ideas, Richard Epstein takes a look at the recent Ninth Circuit decision Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 4:37 pm by Todd Janzen
The Court granted the farmer's petition for appeal (or "certiorari") in Bowman v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:30 am by Todd Janzen
 The court disagreed, and citing statute, stated that farmers are allowed to change the type of farming on a parcel of land without losing the Right to Farm Act's protections. [read post]