Search for: "State v. Farnsworth" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2014, 1:27 pm by Stephen Bilkis
With respect to the specific Article 10 provision at issue in this proceeding, Section 10.07(c), in 2010, in State of New York v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:08 pm by Stephen Bilkis
However, as respondent acknowledged, the identical claim was recently decided by the Fourth Department in State v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 6:14 pm
A case in point: if an auto manufacturer has met federal design minimums (remember, they can always design a product more safely than the minimum standards dictate), the manufacturer will say that the government has "approved" the design, and that it shouldn't be subject to litigation if the design proves faulty, regardless whether the design failure involves exploding gas tanks, failing seat belts ( see our litigation against GM about this Farnsworth v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 9:20 am by Monica Bay
• Adios, Farnsworth: One of my happiest days as a Yankees fan was the day they traded Kyle Farnsworth. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:06 am
Farnsworth, 76 Mass.App.Ct. 87, 920 N.E.2d 45 (Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts 2010) (sufficiency `is to be measured upon that which was admitted in evidence without regard to the propriety of the admission’).Commonwealth v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
Farnsworth, 965 P.2d 1209, 1220 (Alaska 1998), has not imposed an alternative design element, Maines v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 11:38 am by Jennifer Lipinski
Carter **Jennifer Lipinski is a law student at Michigan State University. [read post]