Search for: "State v. Feist"
Results 1 - 20
of 130
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2013, 9:00 am
Feist v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:08 pm
In the recent case of Feist v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 5:26 am
Atari Games Corp. v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 10:39 am
In the United States, there is, of course Feist Publication, Inc. v Rural Telephone Service Company, on telephone directories, and Victor Lalli Enterprises, Inc. v Big Red Apple, Inc. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:57 am
Nonetheless, according to Feist Publications Inc v Rural Telephone Services (499 US 340 (1991)) (Feist) a work that combines non-protectable elements into a larger design may be registered if the overall design is sufficiently creative. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 9:56 am
Finally, UEFA argued that the Office’s assessment was not in line with US Supreme Court judgment in Feist Publications Inc v Rural Telephone Services (499 US 340 (1991)) (Feist).The legal framework and the CORB assessmentPursuant to Section 102a of the US Copyright Act (USC), a work may be registered if it qualifies as an original work of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 4:38 am
This too was rejected, with the US Copyright Office stating that there were no elements embodied in the work, alone or combined, that would be eligible for copyright protection.In its second reconsideration request Tommy Hilfiger restated the earlier claims, and added that the originality of the Flag Logo Design exceeded the standards set out in Feist Publications v Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991), due to the “unique” arrangement of the… [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 10:58 am
Following the US Supreme Court judgment in Feist Publications Inc v Rural Telephone Services (499 US 340 (1991)) (Feist) the term “original” entails two components: independent creation and sufficient creativity. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:25 pm
The leading case in compilation analysis is Feist Publications Inc v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:25 pm
The leading case in compilation analysis is Feist Publications Inc v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 1:41 pm
Supreme Court’s unanimous decision in Feist Publications v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 7:07 am
Here, the standard of originality as set out in Feist Publ’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 3:30 am
” The Supreme Court in its decision in Feist Publ’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 12:42 pm
State law Claims: The court dismisses the state law claims on preemption grounds. __ Is this Oracle v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:40 am
See Feist Publ'ns, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
’ Feist Publ'ns, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 9:21 am
E-Discovery * Feist v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 5:55 am
For a work to be “original” it must be an independent creation of the author and contain sufficient creativity (Feist Publications Inc v Rural Tel. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 12:46 pm
” Feist Publ’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 5:28 am
Downing v. [read post]
