Search for: "State v. Fender"
Results 61 - 80
of 89
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2019, 8:00 am
”Averett v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 11:00 pm
Even though blockchain is a public ledger it is not always possible to identify the perpetrator, such as in the Lavinia Deborah Osbourne v Ozone Networks case mentioned above. [read post]
5 May 2009, 4:29 am
Although the defendant in State v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 9:04 pm
The details follow:Cholewka v. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 4:17 am
Gonzalez-Badillo v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:42 am
See Porsche Cars v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 10:44 am
And I’m just catching up with the fin-fendered fun. [read post]
26 Jul 2006, 12:25 pm
See also Georgia State Bar Rules, DR 7-102(A)(3), (4) and (5); DR 7-106(C) (1); Rule 4-102(d) Standard 45 and O.C.G.A. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 6:11 pm
See State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 9:13 am
McGrath v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:45 pm
Precedential No. 13: TTAB Axes Fender Guitar Shapes, Finding Them Generic or Lacking Acquired DistinctivenessOwnership:Pam Chestek Ponders the Transfer of Common Law Trademarks under State LawTTAB Affirms Rejection of SOU filed by Assignor After AssignmentTTAB Resolves Santana's Ownership Dispute, But Pamela Chestek is DissatisfiedTTAB Finds No Trademark Rights in OEM Who Applied "WASTEMAID" Mark at Others' DirectionPriority:Precedential No. 16: TTAB Throws New… [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 1:17 pm
Jacobson v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 10:53 am
v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 7:03 am
In Brenman v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 7:03 am
In Brenman v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 5:00 am
See Brigham City v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 1:21 am
The suit, Byers v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 10:21 am
Both sides emerged as both winners and losers (see PatLit here for a brief explanation and some idle speculation as to what the costs order might look like), and Class 99 waxed lyrical on the analogy between the design issues in this action and those in the 'pig fenders' case ( C & H Engineering v Klucznik [1992] FSR 421: as David Musker notes, "for pig read potato").So is there anything left for the IPKat? [read post]
