Search for: "State v. Ferdinand" Results 41 - 60 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2013, 10:30 am by Francisco Macías
  Chistopher Columbus at the Royal Court of Spain, by Václav Brožik c.1884 This Easter Sunday, March 31, marks the 521st anniversary of the issuance of the Alhambra Decree. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:30 am by INFORRM
On 19 May 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” Winder states: Charles X may have been stupid, vengeful and incompetent, but he was the rightful King of France. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” Winder states: Charles X may have been stupid, vengeful and incompetent, but he was the rightful King of France. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 9:44 am
Pursue Obiang through litigation as the plaintiffs did with Ferdinand Marcos? [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 2:58 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUIT Criminal Practice §3B1.4 Enhancement Applies Even Though MinorA 17 1/2 Year Old Drug Dealer, Active Crime Participant United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:45 am
No, says the European Court of Human Rights | BMG v Cox - when does an ISP lose its safe harbour protection? [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 12:38 pm by John Elwood
” Judge Ferdinand Fernandez, in dissent, characterized the opinion as a “palpable evasion of Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 4:08 pm
Wolfgang Benedek, Implications of the Independence of Kosovo for International LawHazel Fox, The Merits and Defects of the 2004 UN Convention on State Immunity: Gerhard Hafner's Contribution to its Adoption by the United NationsAndrea Gattini, The International Customary Law Nature of Immunity from Measures of Constraint for State Cultural Property on LoanMarcelo G. [read post]
9 May 2012, 2:51 am by Legal Beagle
If there is any consolation to be had, Roberts believes, it is the lack of success they have at fulfilling their stated goals. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 2:23 pm by Jeff Gamso
(Yeah, Gamso, you've made this point before, too.)In Kansas v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 4:26 am
However, failure to disclose the wrongdoing is insufficient to invoke this "uncommon remedy," which requires fraudulent behavior (Ross, 8 NY3d at 491; see also, Zumpano, 6 NY3d at 675; Weiss v Manfredi, 83 NY2d 974, 977 [1994]; Ferdinand v Crecca & Blair, 5 AD3d 538, lv. to appeal denied, 5 NY3d 710 [2004]). [read post]