Search for: "State v. Ferrari" Results 1 - 20 of 135
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2023, 12:06 am by Frank Cranmer
  Cedar, hyssop, prayer – and COVID In Wiseman v Rex [2023] EWCA Crim 1363, the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) upheld the fraud conviction of the head of the Kingdom Church for selling an oil mixture that he represented would protect against or cure COVID. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:04 am by Alessandro Cerri
The Court, however, applying the principles of construction established in Arnold v Britton, Wood v Capita and Rainy Sky, found that on a correct construction, the 1997 licence only licensed Ford’s US federal trade marks, and not any others. [read post]
12 May 2022, 2:17 am by Michael Douglas
’ (2015) 7 Journal of Media Law 1, 21. [2] See, eg, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, art 19(3). [3] SPEECH Act s 3; United States Code, title 28, Part VI, § 4102. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 2:46 am by Jan Jacobi
These questions were recently answered in a ruling by the CJEU in the Globus v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 12:00 pm by Cristina Mariottini
Still, the courts of different contracting States apply the Convention differently. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 11:02 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
 Trade Marks GuestKat Nedim Malovic commented on the CJEU judgment in Ferrari SpA v DU, C–720/18 and C–721/18 concerning the scope of ‘genuine use’ in trade mark law. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:02 am by Nedim Malovic
In 2014, Ferrari produced a one-off piece with the model designation ‘Ferrari F12 TRS’.The Regional Court in Düsseldorf ordered the cancellation of the two registrations on the ground that Ferrari – during a continuous period of five years – had not made genuine use of the marks in Germany and in Switzerland. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 2:00 am by mes286
FIU College of Law– Hannibal Travis, Professor of Law, FIU College of Law, presents today, The United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 4:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
When judicial officers seek to speak out publicly by participating in demonstrations, vigils, protests, or marches, two countervailing interests are at play: the First Amendment rights of the judge versus the state's interest in preserving the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary. [read post]