Search for: "State v. Fetters" Results 1 - 20 of 124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2012, 3:02 am by tracey
Regina (Rudewicz) v Secretary of State for Justice (Save Fawley Court Committee and others, interested parties) [2012] EWCA Civ 499;  [2012] WLR (D)  121 “It was for the Secretary of State of Justice, as the licensing authority for the exhumation of human remains (other than the power of a consistory court to grant a faculty to exhume human remains interred in consecrated ground of the Anglican Church), to determine on what grounds and in what circumstances to grant… [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 9:08 am by Sean O'Beirne, Kingsley Napley LLP
 (R (Lumba) v Secretary of state for the Home Department (JUSTICE intervening) [2011] UKSC 12). [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:42 am by SAMANTHA KNIGHTS, MATRIX
The majority drew upon the case law of the ECtHR (Rodriguez Da Silva, Hoogkamer v Netherlands and Jeunesse v Netherlands). [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 10:40 am by Jack Kennedy
As such, consideration of ECHR, art 6 ought to have formed part of the Secretary of State’s decision-making process. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 7:53 am
” Meanwhile, intervener West Coast LEAF released a statement stating its disappointment with the ruling. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 9:07 am by Karon Monaghan QC, Matrix
Apparently, some who were consulted saw legislation as an unwelcome fetter on the volunteer and thought it important that volunteering was kept wholly distinct from employment.  [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 2:37 am by Rosalind English
The “fettering discretion” argument was based on the wrong question. [read post]
2 May 2011, 2:27 pm by NL
R (MK & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2011) CA (Civ Div) 14/4/2011 [Not on bailii, only a case note on lawtel]. [read post]
2 May 2011, 2:27 pm by NL
R (MK & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2011) CA (Civ Div) 14/4/2011 [Not on bailii, only a case note on lawtel]. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  DRE  The HistPhil forum on the Dartmouth College v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of  section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10  Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act… [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 5:19 pm
The Court found that the language of Article 301 does not impose any fetter on taxing power of States. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 5:19 pm
The Court found that the language of Article 301 does not impose any fetter on taxing power of States. [read post]