Search for: "State v. Fish"
Results 1 - 20
of 3,395
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2012, 5:18 pm
On October 3, 2012, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 9:22 am
United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:09 pm
Bullitt (collectively, the Conservancy) allege that the United States is improperly diverting water from Icicle Creek to the Leavenworth National Fish Hatchery (the Hatchery) and otherwise violating Washington State law. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 5:00 am
Supreme Court has sent Weyerhaeuser Company v United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 586 U. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 12:49 am
In State v. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 9:42 am
United States, 973 F. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 9:42 am
United States, 973 F. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 5:36 am
A group of charter boat captains and owners challenged the regulation, Mexican Gulf Fishing v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 3:41 am
Bloomsbury International Ltd and others v Sea Fish Industry Authority and another [2010] EWCA Civ 263; [2010] WLR (D) “The Sea Fish Industry Authority (Levy) Regulations 1995, which empowered the Sea Fish Industry Authority to treat sea fish and sea fish products imported from a member state of the European Union as ‘landed’ in the United Kingdom for the purpose of imposing levies upon them, were ultra vires s 4 of the… [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 10:14 am
To review the Court of Appeal opinion, click this link - Kern County Water Agency v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 10:11 am
A fish may be a tangible object, but a federal exchange is really a state exchange because it needs to be. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 11:30 am
Last week, the United States Supreme Court granted review in Fish and Wildlife Service v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 12:57 pm
However, in the case of Krinitt v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 3:54 pm
United States, No. 13-7451. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 11:24 am
Briefs: Appellants Opening BriefRespondent Cooke Aquaculture Pacific BriefRespondent Washington Department Fish & Wildlife Corrected Response BriefAppellants Reply BriefAmicus – Jamestown S’klallam TribeAmicus Washington State Department of EcologyAmicus – Swinomish Indian Tribal CommunityAppellants’ Answer to AmicusAppellants Answer to Amicus Washington State Department of EcologyWDFW’s Answer to Amicus Swinomish Indian Tribal… [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:18 pm
Baker (1818) 16 U.S. 541, 545); quite recently, it determined that a fish is not a “tangible object” (United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 10:25 am
In next Wednesday’s oral argument in Washington v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:01 am
United States Fish & Wildlife – 5/26/15. [read post]
25 May 2010, 3:51 am
The first reported American case I could find referencing the term in its legal context (as opposed to an actual fishing trip) was Barry v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 6:09 am
Of Fish And Wildlife (Wash. [read post]
