Search for: "State v. Fisher" Results 61 - 80 of 1,648
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2012, 7:20 am by Ilya Somin
(Ilya Somin) The Chronicle of Higher Education reports that several Asian-American groups have filed an amicus brief opposing the University of Texas’ affirmative action program, which is being challenged in Fisher v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 3:25 pm by Lyle Denniston
Fisher’s lawyers had taken her constitutional challenge to the Supreme Court, arguing that the university had not justified the race-conscious part of its admissions plan that it adopted in the wake of the 2003 decision by the Justices in a University of Michigan Law School case (Grutter v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:59 pm by Ilya Somin
In the recent SCOTUSblog symposium on the upcoming Fisher v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm by Richard Ford
As compared to earlier affirmative action cases, relatively little is really at stake in Fisher v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:41 am by Roger Clegg
The following contribution to our Fisher symposium comes from Roger Clegg, president and general counsel of the Center for Equal Opportunity. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:34 am
Mr Justice MostynIn Fisher Meredith LLP v JH & Anor [2012] EWHC 408 (Fam) Mr Justice Mostyn considered an appeal against a wasted costs order made against the wife's solicitors in financial remedy proceedings.The case involved a company in which the husband had been allocated shares, which he claimed he had only ever held as a nominee for his uncle "and/or" his uncle's brothers. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 4:25 am by stu@crimapp.com
On December 7, 2009, the United States Supreme Court reversed the Michigan Court of Appeals ruling in People v Fisher, Docket No. 276439, 2008 WL 786515, *1 (Mich. [read post]
26 May 2015, 4:02 pm
The Fisher case is groundbreaking on a number of fronts, but the erosion of the insurance company’s virtual chokehold on what has been considered legally mandated delay tactics have been put in checkmate by the Fisher v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 12:00 am
Nonetheless, whether an insurance company had an obligation to pay piecemeal benefits remained unsettled until May 7, 2015 when the Colorado Court of Appeals issued its decision in Fisher v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 7:31 am
Fisher goes on to explain why, in contrast to Woodall, the state court ruling was not a mere refusal to extend the Bruton rule to a new context. [read post]