Search for: "State v. Fleming" Results 101 - 120 of 276
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2016, 4:32 am by Jerry Kalish
The lawsuit in question is Fleming v Fidelity Management Trust Company which was filed by a group of participants in the Delta Airlines, Inc. retirement plan against Fidelity alleging breach of fiduciary responsibility for excessive fees charged to their brokerage accounts. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 4:32 am by Jerry Kalish
The lawsuit in question is Fleming v Fidelity Management Trust Company which was filed by a group of participants in the Delta Airlines, Inc. retirement plan against Fidelity alleging breach of fiduciary responsibility for excessive fees charged to their brokerage accounts. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 2:30 pm by Kate Fort
” addresses the issue of “continued custody” thrown into doubt by Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 12:45 pm by Russell Beck
Theft of Trade Secrets Clarification Act of 2012 First, adopted on December 28, 2012, the Theft of Trade Secrets Clarification Act of 2012, amended the EEA in response to the headline-grabbing case, US v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:25 am by Kate Fort
Remedy Brief The four Defendants in this action are largely ignoring this Court’s summary judgment ruling of March 30, 2015, Oglala Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Clearly, law firms are significantly behind the curve, despite law enforcement agencies and cybersecurity firms issuing repeated warnings about the risks of attacks by insiders, fraudsters, hacktivists, unscrupulous competitors and nation-states. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Fleming v Advertiser-News (No.2) [2016] SASC 26 the Court found that an allegation in the publications complained of that the plaintiff had engaged in criminal sexual behaviour was substantially true. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 1:25 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Stated otherwise, the duty imposed upon a municipality when it undertakes to act in loco parentis is nondelegable (see Bartels v County of Westchester, 76 AD2d 517, 523). [read post]