Search for: "State v. Flowers" Results 61 - 80 of 609
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2019, 1:48 pm by Emma Zack
Supreme Court agrees, Flowers’s conviction will be set aside. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
At the very end of last week’s oral argument in Flowers v. [read post]
Per the order list published Friday, the US Supreme Court declined an appeal from a Washington State-based florist who refused to sell flowers to a same-sex couple. [read post]
2 May 2019, 7:00 am by Anthony B. Cavender
Before your mind turns to May and its flowers, here’s a summary: Continue reading → [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
State Bar of Wisconsin. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 2:09 pm by Jon Sands
This is a Batson remand in a capital case given Flowers v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 9:32 am by scanner1
Wick DA 17-0185 2018 MT 99N Criminal – Revocation State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 6:38 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Relevant to this holding was the Court's finding that the prosecutor had a history of racially-discriminatory juror selection practices in this case.The case is Flowers v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 9:14 am
In People v Flowers (2009 NY Slip Op 01044 [4th Dept 2/11/09]) , the defendant was arrested for Criminal Possession of a Controlled Substance in the Third Degree (subdivision 12) while the police were executing a search warrant upon his home. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
Mark Walsh has a first-hand look at yesterday’s argument in Flowers v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 am by Jani
The answer, at least on the outset, is not an obvious one, but was faced by the United Kingdom Court of Appeals over a decade ago.The case in question is 1-800 Flowers Inc v Phonenames Ltd, decided in the very first year of the second millennium, which dealt with the phone number "800-FLOWERS", registered in the US as a trademark in the mid 1980s by the company 800-Flowers Inc. [read post]