Search for: "State v. Frank"
Results 1 - 20
of 4,709
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2024, 3:00 am
The Court of Appeal was clear, in the earlier case of Vestel v Access Advance [2021] EWCA Civ 440, that it is impermissible under English law to bring a free-standing claim for declaratory relief in relation to a FRAND licence. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 6:11 am
This is part of a remarkable trend with the ICJ hearing a flurry of cases with a human rights focus, from the Gambia v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
This Fried Frank alert identifies these key takeaways: – The decision reaffirms that, generally, directors will not face Caremark liability unless the factual context is extreme. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 1:11 pm
Several other states also filed regulatory enforcement actions against Centene. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 8:00 am
The practice note contains discussion on the implications of federal preemption in U.S. banking regulation and changes affecting federal preemption of state consumer protection laws under the Dodd-Frank Act. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 9:40 am
”] From yesterday's decision by Judge Frank Whitney (W.D.N.C.) in McBride v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
In Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
DiNapoli, as State Comptroller, et al., Respondents. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
DiNapoli, as State Comptroller, et al., Respondents. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 1:05 am
The draft regulation is now under debate in the Council of States. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 12:05 am
Saturday: This Week's Ten Most Popular TaxProf Blog Posts Columbia Law Professor Katherine Franke May Be Fired Following Complaint Filed By Two Colleagues Clarifying The Uncertainty Over Direct And Indirect Taxes In Moore v. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 3:11 pm
See Corwin v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 3:20 pm
In addition to the violations surrounding hypothetical performance, one adviser was also found to have (i) made false and misleading statements, (ii) advertised misleading model performance, (iii) been unable to substantiate performance shown in its advertisements, (iv) failed to enter into written agreements with people it compensated for endorsements, and (v) violated recordkeeping and compliance standards including filing a prospectus with the SEC which contained misleading statements… [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 4:05 pm
The fear of a retaliatory prosecution is no illusion: The authors examine a recent Texas case, Villarreal v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 4:24 am
” Sahil Kapur and Frank Thorp V report for NBC News. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 10:40 am
First, in SEC v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 10:40 am
First, in SEC v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 10:40 am
First, in SEC v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 10:44 am
In SEC v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 10:43 am
This notion that Jarkesy will turn out to be a narrow defeat for the administrative state rests on the outlier nature of the Dodd-Frank Act and the aberrance of the changes it brought to SEC enforcement. [read post]
