Search for: "State v. Frank" Results 41 - 60 of 4,348
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2024, 5:31 am by Elizabeth Goitein
Accordingly, any military action that relies solely on these “inherent” powers should be deemed to violate the Posse Comitatus Act, and should be sustained only if it falls within the president’s “conclusive and preclusive” sphere of authority (per Justice Robert Jackson’s concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 3:44 am by Frank Cranmer
Yesterday, 2 December, there was a short debate in the House of Lords on a Question tabled by Baroness Thornton (Lab) and asked on the day by Lord Dubs (Lab), asking His Majesty’s Government whether they conducted an equality impact assessment following the judgment in R (Harrison & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] concerning humanist marriages. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
”[15] The Office of Investor Advocate is required under the Dodd-Frank Act,[16] though the statute only provides that the head of the office, “after consultation with the Chairman of the Commission, may retain or employ”[17] staff, which could be interpreted such that no staff (other than the head of the office and a statutorily required “ombudsman”)[18]are required by law. [read post]
24 Nov 2024, 9:56 pm by Frank Cranmer
Cite this article as: Frank Cranmer, "Political views vs philosophical beliefs: Fairbanks" in Law & Religion UK, 25 November 2024, https://lawandreligionuk.com/2024/11/25/political-views-vs-philosophical-beliefs-fairbanks/. [read post]
24 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
”  The firm agreed to pay approximately $166 million in disgorgement and prejudgment interest and an $83 million civil penalty to resolve the SEC’s charges; FirstEnergy Corp. for a multi-year political corruption scheme in which FirstEnergy and affiliates made payments to an entity controlled by a state legislator in exchange for official action benefitting FirstEnergy. [read post]
24 Nov 2024, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is an example from Judge Frank Easterbrook's opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 11:15 am by David Greene
And the primary target seems to be anything to do with gay or lesbian sexuality and anything having to do with a frank acknowledgement of American slavery or Jim Crow racism. [read post]
15 Nov 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
United States was re-argued on its 80th anniversary in an event sponsored by the Robert H. [read post]
14 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
When I was with you two years ago, I quoted President Franklin Roosevelt when he signed the first of the foundational securities laws in 1933: “This law and its effective administration are steps in a program to restore some old-fashioned standards of rectitude. [read post]
10 Nov 2024, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
All courts in the United States are bound by vertical precedent to follow the holdings of decisions by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 6:30 am
Hemel (NYU School of Law), on Wednesday, October 30, 2024 Tags: Adams v. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 6:30 am
Hemel (NYU School of Law), on Wednesday, October 30, 2024 Tags: Adams v. [read post]