Search for: "State v. Frank" Results 41 - 60 of 4,698
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
McCabe (concluding that the classification of marijuana was not rational); State v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 7:11 pm by Francis Pileggi
Frank Reynolds, who has been covering Delaware corporate decisions for various national publications for over 35 years, prepared this article. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am by admin
His editorial board included such testifying luminaries as Arthur Frank, Barry S. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 12:05 pm by admin
Kelly, 42 Ohio App. 3d 184 (1987). [4] Freels v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am by Frank Cranmer
Significantly, Linden J refers to R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL15 and R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 as the two leading Article 9 cases in this jurisdiction. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 2:05 am by Frank Cranmer
The judgment In R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL 15, Lord Nicholls had drawn a distinction at [16] between the two elements of Article 9: there was “a difference between freedom to hold a belief and freedom to express or ‘manifest’ a belief. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]