Search for: "State v. Frank"
Results 61 - 80
of 4,343
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2024, 4:45 am
Given that the Bill is single-purpose, Frank (as a former Clerk of Bills in the House of Commons) reckons that it’s unselectable on the grounds that it is outside the scope of the Bill. [read post]
18 Oct 2024, 7:55 am
In West Virginia v. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 7:14 am
Chapter 15A did not address amending warrants, then looked to Franks v. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 3:54 am
Bs Thornton pointed out that in 2020, the High Court had ruled (in R (Harrison & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin) at [111]) that the failure to provide humanist marriages in England and Wales was discriminatory and the Government could not simply “sit on its hands” and do nothing – to which Lord Ponsonby responded, not unreasonably, that “the previous Government chose not to respond to the Law Commission report, and we… [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 1:19 am
The Press release accompanying the publication of the document is frank in its acknowledgment that Cafcass needs to do better: “I am sorry that some four years on from the Harm Panel report, there are still children and adults in family court proceedings who do not receive the protection they deserve and require. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 2:24 am
Cite this article as: Frank Cranmer, "Anti-Zionism as a protected belief: final judgment in Miller v University of Bristol" in Law & Religion UK, 16 October 2024, https://lawandreligionuk.com/2024/10/16/anti-zionism-as-a-protected-belief-final-judgment-in-miller-v-university-of-bristol/. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 7:13 pm
Comparing Cuba’s National Assembly Elections in 2018 and 2023” Larry Catá Backer, Penn State University, “Cuba—The Construction of a State of Misery” Enrique S. [read post]
13 Oct 2024, 9:01 pm
Takeaways This dichotomy between the civil penalty amounts assessed to those who self-reported and those who did not appears to be intentional, and was underscored by the Commission in its Litigation Release announcing the settlements, which stated specifically that the resolutions “illustrate how seriously the Commission takes non-compliance as well as the benefits a firm may derive from self-reporting its non-compliance. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 6:30 am
Lorianne Updike Toler & Robert Capodilupo After all its hype, United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 5:23 am
From Judge Kari Dooley's opinion last week in Indelicato v. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 5:31 am
The court’s ruling is based on longstanding legal precedent, including the decision in Mansur v. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 5:13 am
Frank is short and sweet. [read post]
6 Oct 2024, 5:58 pm
In United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 9:05 pm
Ford” (2008) 3 Virginia Law & Business Review 177, 179; Frank H. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 2:37 pm
Cal.) in Kohls v. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 10:45 am
” The second award resulted from a rare whistleblower victory in Tax Court, Whistleblower 18152-17W v. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 12:15 am
Franke v. [read post]
29 Sep 2024, 9:15 am
For the Defendant, he gave an address in San Francisco in the United States of America. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 2:37 pm
On August 30, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled in Barr v. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 5:01 am
During the party, the defendant believed that she was called a nigger (N-word) by another member of the fraternity, Frank V., a black male. [read post]