Search for: "State v. Frank" Results 101 - 120 of 4,459
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2017, 12:16 pm by Schachtman
Affinia Group, 2016‐Ohio‐2830, ¶ 37, 54 N.E.3d 174, 182; In reJames Wilson Assoc., 965 F.2d 160, 173 (7th Cir.1992); United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:37 am by John Jascob
Jason Howard, J.D.The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey has determined that a former UBS employee's testimony before FINRA did not equate to providing information to the SEC as required by the Dodd-Frank Act’s definition of “whistleblower” (Price v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 1:59 pm by Jason M. Halper
The court adopted GE Energy’s argument that Dodd-Frank did not protect employees against retaliation in response to internal reporting, stating that “[u]nder Dodd-Frank’s plain language and structure, there is only one category of whistleblowers: individuals who provide information relating to a securities law violation to the SEC. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 10:56 am by Gary Enis
Last week, the United States Supreme Court released its decision in Digital Realty Trust v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 6:32 am by Daniel O'Rielly
 In one of the first cases to analyze the preemption standard contained in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, in Baptisa v. [read post]