Search for: "State v. Frank" Results 121 - 140 of 4,642
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2023, 4:12 am by Peter Mahler
The answer to Question #5 is “No” as established in the Pachter v Winiarsky case Frank McRoberts and I blogged about here, here, and here. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 11:40 am by Eugene Volokh
" Hernden alleges that Defendant Frank Bednard—member and president of the Board— then forwarded Hernden's email to the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) with a complaint about her behavior. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:09 am by Mills & Mills LLP
In the unconscionability context, this Court has recognized a general duty to make full and frank disclosure of all relevant financial information in family law cases. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 5:00 am
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, No. 42 MAP 2022 (Pa. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 2:42 pm by NARF
Frank (Indian Civil Rights Act; Probation Revocation) Williams v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am by Guest Author
”[4] Former Clinton Administration OIRA head Sally Katzen states that  “[t]he virtues of analysis—as robust as needed, commensurate with the significance of the decision being made—are, to me, self-evident: the regulator must think through, with all available data and in a systematic and disciplined way, all the intended and unintended consequences of a proposed rule. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:32 am by Patricia Hughes
The test in Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 5:58 pm by Bill Marler
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
30 May 2023, 11:19 am by Patricia Hughes
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The injunction prohibits defendants from continuing to collect co-payments and does not mandate specific conduct by them (State of New York v Town of Haverstraw, 219 AD2d 64, 65-66 [2d Dept 1996]; see generally Second on Second CafÉ, Inc. v Hing Sing Trading, Inc., 66 AD3d 255, 264 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The injunction prohibits defendants from continuing to collect co-payments and does not mandate specific conduct by them (State of New York v Town of Haverstraw, 219 AD2d 64, 65-66 [2d Dept 1996]; see generally Second on Second CafÉ, Inc. v Hing Sing Trading, Inc., 66 AD3d 255, 264 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]