Search for: "State v. Franklin" Results 1 - 20 of 1,384
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2016, 8:04 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Writ of error coram nobis — Significant collateral consequences In 2004, Charles Franklin Stansbury, Jr., appellant, pleaded guilty, in the Circuit Court for Harford County, to driving on a suspended license and to second-degree assault. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 6:58 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Error coram nobis — Knowing and voluntary plea In 2010, appellant Franklin Enang (“Enang”) pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute marijuana. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:35 am by lpcprof
For one example of how appellate courts treat the magician argument, see State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 6:59 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Now, more recently, in another Franklin County Court of Common Pleas Facebook case entitled Arcq v. [read post]
13 Feb 2021, 3:52 am by Umakanth Varottil
In its ruling announced yesterday in Franklin Templeton Trustee Services Private Limited v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 2:07 pm by Andrew Hamm
., the American Constitution Society and the Center for Democracy and Technology will host a panel discussion on United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 8:00 am by Howard Bashman
It’s not everyday that a federal criminal prosecution is argued in a state court of last resort: On Monday, the Supreme Court of Wisconsin heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 10:42 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
The principal case upon which the Government relies, Franklin v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:39 am
Freedom of Law only applies to public entitiesMcBride v Franklin, 288 AD2d 130 The McBride decision demonstrates that only a public entity is subject to the provisions of New York States' Freedom of Information Law [FOIL], (Section 84, Public Officers Law). [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 9:07 pm
Franklin Loufrani, Oppositions Nos. 91150278, 91154632, and 91152145 (March 20, 2009) [not precedential]. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 9:44 am
United States, 295 U.S. 495 (1935) on how Congress could not delegate its legislative authority to the President (Roosevelt - Franklin, not Teddy.) [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 12:39 pm by David Jacobson
In Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Metcash Trading Limited [2011] FCAFC 151 the Full Federal Court dismissed the ACCC’s appeal against the trial judge’s decision that the proposed acquisition by Metcash of the Franklins supermarket business was not likely to result in a substantial lessening of competition in the wholesale supply of packaged groceries to independent retailers in NSW and the ACT. [read post]