Search for: "State v. Freitas"
Results 1 - 20
of 76
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2016, 7:34 am
The case of Economou v de Freitas ([2016] EWHC 1853 (QB)) was the first case to substantively consider in detail the new “public interest” defence since the Defamation Act 2013 came into force, clarifying that the Court will place a great deal of weight on whether the Defendant “reasonably believed” the publication was in the public interest and not just on whether it was a general matter of public interest. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:33 am
The case, Freitas v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 10:23 am
In Freitas v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
In FTC v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
From SSRN:Sally Tyler, Of Temples and Territory: The ICJ's Preah Vihear Decision and Implications for Regional Dispute Resolution, (University of the District of Columbia Law Review, Forthcoming).Shaun Alberto de Freitas, Doctrinal Sanction and the Protection of the Rights of Religious Associations: Ecclesia De Lange v The Presiding Bishop of the Methodist Church of Southern Africa, (Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, Vol. 19, 2016).Nancy Levit, After Obergefell: The… [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
In Wiener v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 4:05 am
Samar, Toward a New Separation of Church and State: Implications for Analogies to the Supreme Court Decision in Hobby Lobby by the Decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:24 pm
So, we were a bit surprised when we happened across Freitas v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 12:09 am
Written by Eduardo Silva de Freitas (Erasmus University Rotterdam), member of the Vici project Affordable Access to Justice, financed by the Dutch Research Council (NWO), www.euciviljustice.eu. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:25 pm
This is admittedly a setback for the collective protection of privacy rights, notably similar to the one following the 2021 United Kingdom Supreme Court ruling in Lloyd v Google. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 6:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 4:40 pm
The existence of a ‘public interest’ defence The Court of Appeal set out the law as it stands following the case of Economou v De Freitas [2018] EWCA 2591 (at [44] – [48]) as well as identifying the relevant principles for determining the meaning of “public interest” (at [33] – [35]). [read post]
6 May 2015, 4:10 pm
Therefore lawyers play a key role in ensuring that the courts, whose mission is fundamental in a State based on the rule of law, enjoy public confidence. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:09 pm
The following matters are listed for next term Economou v De Freitas 13 June 2016, listed for 6-10 days [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 12:45 pm
Shaun de Freitas addresses the recent case of Gaum v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 4:23 pm
The case provides some Supreme Court guidance on section 4, largely endorsing the decision in Alexander Economou v David de Freitas [2018] EWCA Civ 2591, whilst adding some refinement on the legal analysis provided therein. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm
There may be some other way in which the hypothetical ordinary reasonable reader would identify him/her: Economou v de Freitas [2017] EMLR 4, [2016] EWHC 1853 (QB) (27 July 2016) [9] … 21. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:23 pm
Moroney v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 4:54 pm
[An overlooked part of United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 11:46 am
” United States v. [read post]
