Search for: "State v. Gaines" Results 201 - 220 of 10,340
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
The petition of the day is: United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 12:46 pm by JT
Some have said no-pain, no gain. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 2:57 am
June 18, 2009), that a prisoner has no procedural or a substantive federal due process right to gain post-conviction access to forensic evidence in the state's possession in order to subject it to DNA testing. [read post]
15 May 2012, 6:02 am by Julia Zebley
United States [SCOTUSblog backgrounder] that family farmers filing bankruptcy under Chapter 12 of the bankruptcy code [text] cannot discharge a capital gains tax incurred by a post-petition sale of a farm, as the profit of that sale is not considered part of the estate. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 10:00 pm
Supreme Court issued its decision in MeadWestvaco Corp. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 12:08 pm by raoneeri
Thomas Professor of Law, was featured in an episode of the popular new podcast Ipse Dixit to discuss his book “United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 1:53 pm by Rob Howse
It is a well known story that Big Pharma aggressively uses trade negotiations, political lobbying, and domestic and international litigation (and the threat thereof) to expand the monopoly rents it gains from patent protection, and defeat the effort of states to limit intellectual property rights in the public interest, whether through compulsory licensing, or other means. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 6:15 pm by pfriedman
It’s well worth revisiting the decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit (the Circuit in which the court hearing Shepard Fairey’s lawsuit against AP and Manny Garcia is pending) in Blanch v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
(`Criminal forfeiture focuses on the disgorgement by a defendant of his “ill-gotten gains”’) (quoting U.S. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 4:56 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 The Court's ruling states that the civil rights act does not require employers to be neutral but rather, that they provide an applicant's or employee's religious practices "favored treatment. [read post]