Search for: "State v. Gaines" Results 201 - 220 of 10,145
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Guest Post by Akshita JhaThis part of the analysis puts forward the brief facts of the case, coupled with the analysis of the medical reports and the reasoning of the Supreme Court behind giving the final verdict.Introduction After the issuance of a notice for the contempt of court to Justice Markandey Katju, the Soumya Rape case (Govindaswamy v State of Kerala, Criminal Appeal No. 1584-1585 of 2014), which was already in the headlines in the anticipation of death penalty for the… [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Guest Post by Akshita JhaThis part of the analysis puts forward the brief facts of the case, coupled with the analysis of the medical reports and the reasoning of the Supreme Court behind giving the final verdict.Introduction After the issuance of a notice for the contempt of court to Justice Markandey Katju, the Soumya Rape case (Govindaswamy v State of Kerala, Criminal Appeal No. 1584-1585 of 2014), which was already in the headlines in the anticipation of death penalty for the… [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 10:00 pm
Supreme Court issued its decision in MeadWestvaco Corp. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 12:08 pm by raoneeri
Thomas Professor of Law, was featured in an episode of the popular new podcast Ipse Dixit to discuss his book “United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 1:53 pm by Rob Howse
It is a well known story that Big Pharma aggressively uses trade negotiations, political lobbying, and domestic and international litigation (and the threat thereof) to expand the monopoly rents it gains from patent protection, and defeat the effort of states to limit intellectual property rights in the public interest, whether through compulsory licensing, or other means. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 6:15 pm by pfriedman
It’s well worth revisiting the decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit (the Circuit in which the court hearing Shepard Fairey’s lawsuit against AP and Manny Garcia is pending) in Blanch v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
(`Criminal forfeiture focuses on the disgorgement by a defendant of his “ill-gotten gains”’) (quoting U.S. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 4:56 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 The Court's ruling states that the civil rights act does not require employers to be neutral but rather, that they provide an applicant's or employee's religious practices "favored treatment. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 2:26 pm
This argument also failed to gain traction with the Justices. [read post]