Search for: "State v. Gaines" Results 201 - 220 of 9,595
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2024, 2:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
Through the recent events from the Portland MAX train attacks to Charlottesville, we have seen an emboldened white nationalist movement gain momentum in the United States and violence based on racism has become normalized. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 1:05 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
It has crafted statutes making it harder to gain access to the courthouse and to obtain just compensation for serious injuries once inside. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 6:05 am by Edgar Chen
Trump, his family, and the Trump Organization were ordered to repay more than $450m for fraudulent gains in February. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 6:22 am by Eugene Volokh
And litigation of course deploys the coercive power of the state, even as it also accomplishes private goals. [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 7:50 am by Guest Contributor
  After all, these litigants have nothing to lose and everything to gain. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 6:04 am by Noah Chauvin
Senator, a state senator, and a state court judge who reported alleged civil rights violations. [read post]
On July 26, 2024, the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) issued its Fair Choice – Employee Voice Final Rule (“Final Rule”), which rescinds a trio of April 2020 amendments to the Board’s Rules and Regulations[1] affecting the Board’s processing of petitions that ultimately make it easier for unions to maintain recognition and stifles employee choice in whether to be represented by a union. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 10:22 am by Giles Peaker
An example would be where the landlord gets the year wrong, as in Pease v Carter (where a notice of possession proceedings served on 7th November 2018 stated that court proceedings would not begin until after 26th November 2017, an obvious typographical error). [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Bankruptcy judges sometimes gained further power to finalize judgments, though they were not considered Article III judges. [read post]