Search for: "State v. Gaines" Results 281 - 300 of 10,379
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2016, 1:03 am by John Diekman
  In other words, damages are calculated to compensate plaintiffs for what they lost because of the fraud, not for what they might have gained in the absence of fraud.Student note:  A claim of actual injury or damage is an essential element in any claim of fraud.Case:  Connaughton v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 7:37 am
If convicted, each Defendant faces  a maximum penalty of 30 years in prison and a $1 million fine, or twice the gross gain or loss from the offense.United States of America v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 4:42 pm by Jeff Gittins
The Utah Supreme Court recently issued its decision in the case of Rocky Ford Irrigation Company v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:30 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
One of 2012's most important competition law cases involved the Ninth Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 2:16 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
She stated that the Secretary of State did not seriously consider the most cost-effective form which such an inquiry might take or the “bigger picture” in that it was in the public interest to properly inquire about events of this magnitude and the importance of setting the record straight as well as providing truth to the relatives and survivors, Harrison v UK applied. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 10:06 am by Michael Price
  Earlier this year, the Second Circuit waded into these waters when an en banc panel decided United States v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:01 pm by Christopher Mathews
Last week, AFCCA heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 9:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for their own financial gain,” explained the letter. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 8:48 am
  The Scotus Wiki page for Cone v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 2:42 pm
On page 643, Judge Tallman writes: "This is not a situation in which the United States used a request for admissions to gain an unfair tactical advantage. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 10:19 am
"Section 2(6) of the 1977 Act, which is derived from Article 54(5) of the EPC, states:"(6) In the case of an invention consisting of a substance or composition for use in a method of treatment of the human or animal body by surgery or therapy or of diagnosis practised on the human or animal body, the fact that the substance or composition forms part of the state of the art shall not prevent the invention from being taken to be new if the use of the substance or… [read post]