Search for: "State v. Gaines" Results 301 - 320 of 10,812
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
The House of Lords Communications and Digital Committee’s report on Large Language Models has concluded it is not “fair for tech firms to use rightsholder data for commercial purposes without permission or compensation, and to gain vast financial rewards in the process”. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
Shockingly, there are individuals who not only find joy in this bloodsport but also seek financial gain from the suffering of these defenceless creatures. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
However, the claim that a large increase in the number of would-be migrants gaining entry at the southern border constitutes an “invasion” under Article IV is constitutional nonsense. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
* See Matter of DeFazio v DiNapoli, 211 AD3d 1254, and Matter of Frederick v New York State Comptroller, 204 AD3d 1292.** See Matter of Pirrone v Town of Wallkill, 6 AD3d 447, in which the Appellate Division addressed the recommendation of a hearing officer's finding that the individual was required to undergo spinal fusion surgery or forfeit General Municipal Law §207-c disability retirement benefits. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
* See Matter of DeFazio v DiNapoli, 211 AD3d 1254, and Matter of Frederick v New York State Comptroller, 204 AD3d 1292.** See Matter of Pirrone v Town of Wallkill, 6 AD3d 447, in which the Appellate Division addressed the recommendation of a hearing officer's finding that the individual was required to undergo spinal fusion surgery or forfeit General Municipal Law §207-c disability retirement benefits. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]