Search for: "State v. Gaines" Results 121 - 140 of 10,082
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am by Mark Spinney, Olswang LLP
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am by Mark Spinney, Olswang LLP
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 11:00 am by Charles Nichols
In an order by Judge Krieger on April 22, 2010, the court re-set the two sentencing hearings as follows: Phase I – the evidentiary phase or hearing on "gain" will be held on June 22, 2010 beginning at 8:30am and will continue as necessary to the following day. [read post]
12 May 2010, 6:35 am by immigrationprof
We continue to try to gain an understanding of how a Justice Elena Kagan might approach immigration matters. [read post]
25 May 2011, 9:00 am by Record on Appeal
We are pleased to welcome fellow blogger and attorney Charley Foster from Planet Kauai in a discussion of State v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 8:07 am by Pace Law Library
The experts will provide examples of how two similar facilities, one in the EU and one in the United States, face pertinent EHS issues. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 9:50 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
Constitution, the Second Amendment's right to bear arms, may gain some ground here at the beginning of the 21st Century. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 8:07 am by Eric Goldman
Long sought to take advantage of Section 230’s IP exception, but his tort claims didn’t pertain to IP, and Section 230 would preempt state IP claims anyways (Perfect 10 v. ccBill). [read post]