Search for: "State v. Garcia"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,576
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2019, 10:50 am
The following speakers have already committed to speak at the conference: ▪ Eyal Benvenisti, University of Cambridge ▪ Heike Krieger, Freie Universität Berlin ▪ Silja Vöneky, University of Freiburg Call for papers: We now call upon scholars to consider contributing a paper to the conference. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 3:16 pm
Wyndham International and Garcia v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 3:16 pm
Wyndham International and Garcia v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 10:50 am
Garcia v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:55 pm
The committee will hear testimony from David Hale, the undersecretary of state for political affairs. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 9:15 am
’ ” Montero-Garcia v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:41 am
The decision below is State v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:08 am
Taylor, the State Department’s Chargé d’Affaires Ad Interim in Ukraine, and George Kent, the deputy assistant secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 2:59 am
Advocates argue that Congress didn’t really end Indian reservation status for much of the state of Oklahoma even if everyone at the time thought it did [Will Baude on Sharp v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 1:35 pm
The following speakers have already committed to speak at the conference: ▪ Eyal Benvenisti, University of Cambridge ▪ Heike Krieger, Freie Universität Berlin ▪ Silja Vöneky, University of Freiburg Call for papers: We now call upon scholars to consider contributing a paper to the conference. [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 3:00 pm
Judge Carlos Bea United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm
The following speakers have already committed to speak at the conference: ▪ Eyal Benvenisti, University of Cambridge ▪ Heike Krieger, Freie Universität Berlin ▪ Silja Vöneky, University of Freiburg Call for papers: We now call upon scholars to consider contributing a paper to the conference. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:41 pm
Richard V. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 3:58 am
Garcia, which asks whether federal immigration law preempts a state prosecution for identity theft based on using someone else’s Social Security number to obtain employment, for this blog. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 1:19 pm
Kagan then queried whether Arizona v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 12:01 pm
Garcia, asks whether the Immigration Reform and Control Act prevents states from using information on federal I-9 forms to prosecute individuals. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 4:49 am
Garcia, a case raising the question of federal preemption of the application of a state identity fraud law in a case involving criminal prosecutions of undocumented immigrants. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 3:59 am
Garcia, which asks whether federal immigration law preempts a state prosecution for identity theft based on using someone else’s Social Security number to obtain employment, was also argued yesterday. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 10:27 pm
In Garcia v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 3:55 am
Garcia, which asks whether federal immigration law preempts a state prosecution for identity theft based on using someone else’s Social Security number to obtain employment. [read post]
