Search for: "State v. Garcia"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,495
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2024, 1:30 am
Matter of City of Watertown v State of N.Y. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 6:30 am
Hemel (NYU School of Law), on Wednesday, October 30, 2024 Tags: Adams v. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 6:30 am
Hemel (NYU School of Law), on Wednesday, October 30, 2024 Tags: Adams v. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 8:28 am
[Mexico] [Habitual residence] Petition granted]Garcia, v. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 3:12 pm
In Vince v. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 6:00 am
Servs., 3 NY3d 498, 505 [2004]; see also Matter of New York State Off. of Children & Family Serv [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 6:00 am
Servs., 3 NY3d 498, 505 [2004]; see also Matter of New York State Off. of Children & Family Serv [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 7:27 pm
Understanding the issues in Mexico v. [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 4:56 am
State of California (2023) 98 Cal. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 11:19 am
”28 Subsequently, in McMahon v. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 4:00 am
As a consequence, many have come to view mainstream media as a de facto state media. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 1:34 am
China The State Council of China published the Regulations on Administration of Network Data Security, which will take effect on 1 January 2025. [read post]
20 Oct 2024, 3:43 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 3:24 pm
The legal complexities of copyright enforcement on YouTube were highlighted in Garcia v. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 4:30 am
And third, I discuss how the settlement in Garcia v. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 7:03 am
Will Rollins (D) v. [read post]
24 Sep 2024, 2:00 am
See Mayfield v. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 6:05 am
Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 4:19 pm
State, stating “[a]lthough such a defendant cannot advance a due diligence defense, he has the statutory twenty-day remedy, and in appropriate circumstances, may have a Constitutional speedy hearing claim under Barker v. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 4:18 pm
App. 2002) (finding it imprudent to overturn 40 years of precedent requiring due diligence by State in executing motion to revoke capias) with Garcia v. [read post]