Search for: "State v. Gardner" Results 1 - 20 of 387
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2016, 7:36 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Identification of defendant at a show-up A jury in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County convicted Clifton Gardner, appellant, of fourth-degree burglary. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 10:28 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress — Reasonable articulable suspicion Appellants, Kirby Reaves, Jason McCray, and Kennard Gardner, entered into conditional guilty pleas in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City to various handgun offenses, after their motion to suppress was jointly litigated and denied. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 11:00 am by MBettman
Under those circumstances, handcuffing and patting down Gardner for the officer’s safety was not unreasonable, and was justified under Terry v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 8:06 am by Charon QC
The United Kingdom Supreme Court judgment authorising Assange’s  extradition to Sweden Carl Gardner: Lord Kerr on the Assange case Carl Gardner: Supreme Court judgment: Assange v Swedish Judicial Authority Carl Gardner: Could Assange apply to set aside the Supreme Court judgment? [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:39 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 4:55 am by jrvann
In the recent North Carolina Court of Appeals case, Gardner v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:38 am by Laura Orr
(Even if the officer can recite “Miranda Warnings” by heart, and most can, they are not infrequently advised to read them from a printed card, primarily to avoid any dispute over dropped words or phrases, however inadvertent.)The June 30, 2010, Oregon Court of Appeals case, State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 10:32 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Reasonable articulable suspicion Appellants, Kirby Reaves, Jason McCray, and Kennard Gardner, entered into conditional guilty pleas in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City to various handgun offenses, after their motion to suppress was jointly litigated and denied. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 2:29 pm
The Respondents in the Pyett v. 14 Penn Plaza case, to be argued in the United States Supreme Court this fall, filed their brief this week. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 5:40 am
Lawcast 141: The House of Lords judgment on control orders Today I am talking to Carl Gardner, ex government lawyer and author of the Head of Legal blog about the House of Lords judgment in Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) v AF (Appellant) (FC) and another (Appellant) and one other action Lord [...] [read post]