Search for: "State v. Garrett" Results 201 - 220 of 518
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2017, 4:00 am
Most liberals pushed back by arguing that the programs at issue in what became the 4-4 deadlocked case of United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:03 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures’ blog, Lisa Soronen discusses last week’s decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 6:55 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Resolving Juror Confusion New York’s Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department rendered an opinion in People v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps discusses Buck v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:00 am by Jane Chong
Recognizing how narrowly the order defines sanctuary jurisdictions is helpful in avoiding unnecessary rabbit holes, like the recurring suggestion that, for purposes of fighting Trump’s executive order, the § 1983 Third Circuit case Galarza v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
On Monday, the court issued an opinion in Beckles v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 11:03 am by Liz Hayes
Garrett added there is “no scientific basis for intelligent design and federal courts have made clear that teaching it in public school science classrooms violates” church-state separation. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures’ blog, Lisa Soronen discusses McWilliams v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:49 am by Rokia Hassanein
  Garrett added there is “no scientific basis for intelligent design and federal courts have made clear that teaching it in public school science classrooms violates” church-state separation. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps argues that the case, along with Jennings v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 10:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 2526 (ND IL, Jan. 5, 2017), an Illinois federal district court allowed an inmate to move ahead with his claim that his placement in segregation in violation of his due process rights resulted in restrictions on his ability to practice his Roman Catholic religion.In Garrett v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Nelson v. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 9:31 pm by RegBlog
  Still Seeking Contraceptive Compromise After Zubik v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 3:41 am by Edith Roberts
Virginia State Board of Elections and McCrory v. [read post]