Search for: "State v. Garrett" Results 221 - 240 of 518
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2016, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
At The Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Coventry Health Care of Missouri, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 4:43 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps discusses Lynch v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps discusses Hasty v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 4:43 am by Edith Roberts
” At Reuters, Alison Frankel suggests that next term’s Salman v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Of the justices now on the Court, Samuel Alito seems the most likely to find merit in legal protection for animals, based on his solo dissent in the 2010 case of United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 6:27 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps discusses next Term’s double jeopardy case Bravo-Fernandez v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:22 am by Edith Roberts
Garrett Epps remarks in The Atlantic on the “reduced state” of the Court as it awaits the addition of a ninth justice: “Call it Schrodinger’s Court. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 7:30 am by Andrew Hamm
” For The Atlantic, Garrett Epps relates the Court’s 1935 decision in Minersville School District v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 2:30 am by Lana Ulrich
In 1999, the Justice Department filed a civil racketeering lawsuit, United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 10:23 am by Benjamin Wittes, Zoe Bedell
The complaint does not cite each individual responsible terrorist’s involvement or activity on social media, or even state that these perpetrators had social media accounts. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 4:30 am by Amy Howe
Coverage of the four-four tie in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:52 am by Amy Howe
” At Legal Aggregate, Gregory Ablavsky weighs in on last week’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:12 am by Amy Howe
United States ex rel. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:10 pm
 And there's still time for the state to petition for review, the necessary Prop. 47 proceedings on remand, etc. [read post]