Search for: "State v. Garrett" Results 261 - 280 of 621
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps discusses Buck v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:00 am by Jane Chong
Recognizing how narrowly the order defines sanctuary jurisdictions is helpful in avoiding unnecessary rabbit holes, like the recurring suggestion that, for purposes of fighting Trump’s executive order, the § 1983 Third Circuit case Galarza v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
On Monday, the court issued an opinion in Beckles v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures’ blog, Lisa Soronen discusses McWilliams v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps argues that the case, along with Jennings v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 10:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 2526 (ND IL, Jan. 5, 2017), an Illinois federal district court allowed an inmate to move ahead with his claim that his placement in segregation in violation of his due process rights resulted in restrictions on his ability to practice his Roman Catholic religion.In Garrett v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Nelson v. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 9:31 pm by RegBlog
  Still Seeking Contraceptive Compromise After Zubik v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 3:41 am by Edith Roberts
Virginia State Board of Elections and McCrory v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
At The Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Coventry Health Care of Missouri, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 4:43 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps discusses Lynch v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps discusses Hasty v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 4:43 am by Edith Roberts
” At Reuters, Alison Frankel suggests that next term’s Salman v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Of the justices now on the Court, Samuel Alito seems the most likely to find merit in legal protection for animals, based on his solo dissent in the 2010 case of United States v. [read post]