Search for: "State v. Garrett" Results 281 - 300 of 506
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2015, 8:02 am
“New Orleans Prosecutorial Disclosure in Practice after Connick v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Daily Record Staff
House, appellant, contends that the Circuit Court for Garrett County com m itted plain error by r eading pattern jury instructions on sodom y and unnatural or perverted sexual practice. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm by Andrew Hamm
This morning the Court announced its decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:25 am by Amy Howe
United States, involving the prosecution of threats made on Facebook, was “something of an anticlimax. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 4:53 am by Amy Howe
Commentary continues to focus on Monday’s ruling in Elonis v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:03 am by Gene Quinn
Stoll is currently a partner with Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:55 pm by Andrew Hamm
This morning the Court heard oral argument in Obergefell v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 4:06 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps discusses King v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:03 pm by Andrew Hamm
This morning the Court heard oral argument in King v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 5:52 am by umlaw
Steinzor, Winning Safer Workplaces: A Manual for State and Local Policy Reform (2014).Garrett Power, Constitutional Limitations on Sovereignty (2014 edition).Susan N. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 3:36 am by Amy Howe
” At Big Think, Steven Mazie considers whether, if the Court were to strike down state bans on same-sex marriage, a state court judge could ignore that decision. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 3:47 am by Amy Howe
”   Briefly: Noting in his column for The Atlantic that “state legislatures in the Bible Belt are openly flirting with laws designed to thwart any Supreme Court decision requiring recognition of gay marriage,” Garrett Epps urges the Court “to say forthrightly that when any agents of the state—legislators, judges, clerks—discriminate on this basis, they violate both the Constitution and their oath. [read post]