Search for: "State v. Gates" Results 1 - 20 of 1,639
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2019, 1:25 pm by Sonia Gill
States that used to be covered by preclearance, and even those with less deplorable records, took the Shelby decision as a signal to enact voting restrictions with impunity, and the flood gates were opened to voting discrimination unlike anything the country had seen in a generation. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 10:05 pm by Samantha Maddern and Kathryn Hunter
The Agreement stated: “An Employee’s Project Working Hours shall start at the Employee’s prestart and finish at the inside of the Site Employee access gates. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:57 am by chief
 Now, we have encountered r.13 before (see our note on Willow Court v Alexander here). [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
In its well-known decision of Illinois v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 3:31 am by SHG
While free speech isn’t shed at the school yard gates, as the Supreme Court held in Tinker v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
The Supreme Court’s decision in Minnesota v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 3:22 pm by Stuart P. Meyer
She began by stating, “The majority’s decision expands § 101 well beyond its statutory gate-keeping function and the role of this appellate court well beyond its authority. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 4:22 pm by Orin S. Kerr
  But again, I'm focused on the Ninth Circuit here.) (3) Four years later, in a follow up case, United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Bicameralism and presentment require legislation to pass through multiple veto-gates and (usually) to win the acquiescence of two branches. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:02 am by Ben
In the opinion, the District Judge held that to establish a copyright claim there are two separate enquiries to be undergoneL The first is whether the defendant factually copied portions of plaintiff’s work, and second being those expressions that have been copied are protectable expressions and important to the copied work, citing Gates Rubber Co. v. [read post]