Search for: "State v. Gates" Results 41 - 60 of 2,138
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2023, 9:11 am by Susan Haines
 The contemplated strike and any sympathy strike would shut down all operations at the Louisville terminal because the other trucking companies’ CBAs would not allow Quickway to engage in any mitigation efforts, such as a reserved gate or dedicated lane for drivers. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 6:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To state a cause of action for legal malpractice, a party must allege that “(1) the attorneywas negligent; (2) the attorney’s negligence was a proximate cause of [the party’s] losses; and (3) [the party] suffered actual damages” (RTW Retailwinds, Inc. v Colucci & Umans, 231 AD3d 509, 510 [1st Dept 2023], citing Excelsior Capitol LLC v K & L Gates LLP, 138 AD3d 492 [1st Dept 2016]). [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm by Florian Mueller
" Judge Corley declined to "open the flood gates to prolonged do-over litigation" as opposed to the speedy, efficient, and just resolution that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure seek to ensure. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:56 am by R. Scott Adams
The gates had big crowds of people and [were] dangerous- especially for women. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 6:06 am by Allen L. Harris
Lanza, District Judge for the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:16 am by Dennis Aftergut
Courts use that standard to determine whether an affidavit justifies a search or seizure because there is probable cause to believe that the subject committed a crime.In Illinois v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 3:07 am by SHG
Circuit’s recent Frederick Douglass Foundation v. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 10:18 am by Katitza Rodriguez
Consistent with our arguments, the Court rejected such an assumption, and adopted a “gates up or down" approach: Either you are entitled to access the information, or you are not. [read post]