Search for: "State v. Gates" Results 81 - 100 of 1,539
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2013, 3:27 pm
Following a communication in the summons to oral proceedings, in which Gates was informed that the petition may be found “clearly unallowable”, Gates wrote back in a letter of 3 September 2012, asking the Enlarged BoA to consider in its decision the grounds of irrationality, also known as 'Wednesbury Unreasonableness' as established in Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation [1948]. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:28 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
(collectively, “North- gate”) infringe United States Patent No. 5,411,474 (“’474 patent”). [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 9:11 am
Gates Corporation (trademark infringement) 9/16: Fair Isaac Corporation v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 10:20 am
In 2008, Taser International concluded an agreement with the Romanian company Gate 4 which obliged Gate 4 to assign to Taser International the Taser trade marks which Gate 4 had registered, or for which it had applied for registration, in Romania. [read post]
18 May 2017, 1:08 am by Thomas Long
A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law   More from our authors: Competing for the Internet: ICANN Gate – An Analysis and Plea for Judicial Review Through Arbitration by Flip Petillion & Jan Janssen€ 205 The post USA: Nestle USA, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 9:01 am by MBettman
On September 9, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]