Search for: "State v. Gibbs"
Results 1 - 20
of 202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
” This continues the sordid state of affairs that existed prior to the pandemic, where hundreds of criminal cases were being dismissed annually for delay[9]. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm
[5] Commission Guidance Regarding Disclosure Related to Climate Change, Release No. 33-9106 (Feb. 2, 2010) [75 FR 6290 (Feb. 8, 2010)] [6] See Basic Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 8:33 pm
”[16] However, the experience of the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) should serve as a cautionary tale. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 9:22 am
State v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:41 pm
Gibbs —For more than three decades, FDA has claimed that the Federal Food, Drug & Cosmetic (FD&C Act) gives the agency legal authority to regulate laboratory developed tests (LDTs) as medical devices (see our prior post here). [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Frederick (2007) and Holder v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 11:28 am
Grove s v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:28 am
State v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:28 am
States also have the administrative authority to bar providers from participating in their State Medical Assistance Programs (primarily Medicaid and CHIP).[5] Medicaid exclusion actions[6] are similar to OIG exclusions in many respects, but there are also important differences. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 7:11 am
Gibbs, 886 F.2d 1240, 1245 (10th Cir. 1989); United States ex rel. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 11:19 am
Co. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 12:44 am
Gibbs & Sara W. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 6:52 pm
FDA has in fact asserted this position in the past: CRL v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:23 am
On Wednesday 7 December 2022, there was a hearing in the case of Schlumberger v Gibbs and another (QB-2019-004261). [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am
” This is despite China’s National Intelligence Law which requires citizens to cooperate and assist with state intelligence work. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 3:03 pm
" The speakers are Andre Mura of Gibbs Law Group LLP; Zoe Savitsky of the Oakland City Attorney's Office; Steven E. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
See Schulz v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 12:35 am
And finally…II Per Julian Knowles J in Al-Masarir v Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [2022] EWHC 2199 (QB) at [195]: “There are shades of Mandy Rice-Davies in this explanation — ‘they would say that, wouldn’t they? [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 10:08 am
From Thaler v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 2:21 am
Gibbs & Allyson B. [read post]
