Search for: "State v. Gibson" Results 1 - 20 of 1,158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2024, 11:26 am by centerforartlaw
Other choreographers such as Brian Friedman (“I’m a Slave 4 U”), Laurieann Gibson (“Bad Romance”), JaQuel Knight (“Single Ladies”), and Sean Bankhead (“On My Momma”) have seen similar popularity in their creations. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 4:51 am by Peter A. Mahler
In a post-trial opinion handed down earlier this month by Vice Chancellor Will in Gibson v Konick, the court ordered dissolution of an LLC formed for the purpose of owning a vacation home. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am by Matthias Weller
First, the UK Government has been exemplary in ensuring the “seamless continuity” of the HCCH 2005 Choice of Court Convention throughout the uncertainties of the whole withdrawal process, as evidenced by the UK’s declarations and Note Verbale to the depositary Kingdom of the Netherlands.[17] The same applies mutatis mutandis to the HCCH 1965 Service Convention, to which all EU Member States are parties, and the HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention, which has only been ratified so… [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 11:05 am by Guest Author
Eugene Scalia, the former Secretary of Labor, son of the former Justice, and a partner at Gibson Dunn, filed a lawsuit in the U.S. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 4:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff cannot demonstrate that defendants induced him into signing (see Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v Gibson, 157 AD3d 853, 856 [2d Dept 2018]), or that the contract was usurious or unconscionable, given that he received a cash advance and the repayment terms were contingent upon him securing a judgment or settlement (see Cash4Cases, Inc. v Brunetti, 167 AD3d 448, 449-450 [1st Dept 2018]). [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am by INFORRM
On 14 February 2024 there will be a strike out/summary judgment application in the case of Chowdhury-v-Secretary of State for the Home Department KB-2023-003368. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
A: takings: Sony rootkit is installed, and you’re not allowed to remove it because of the power of the state; similar to Loretto v. [read post]