Search for: "State v. Giles"
Results 201 - 220
of 436
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2023, 8:40 am
Following the case of Giles v Rhind (No 2) [2008] EWCA Civ 118 (“Giles v Rhind”), Mr Justice Jay found that s 32(2) LA 1980 should be interpreted more widely, so as to cover “legal wrongdoing of any kind, giving rise to a right of action”. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 12:49 pm
Birmingham’s stated policy was considered by the court to be in excess of statutory requirements. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 9:15 am
"
Giles v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 2:56 pm
Nicholas v Secretary of State for Defence [2015] EWHC 4064 (Ch) (24 August 2015) Rose J. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 2:14 pm
The question, in large part, was the significance of Lord Neuberger’s judgment in Hotak v Southwark London Borough Council; Kanu v Southwark London Borough Council [2016] AC 811, at paras 78 and 79 “78. [read post]
29 May 2016, 10:52 am
The decision letter addressed the Mohammed criteria (R v Camden LBC exp Mohammed (1997) 30 HLR 315). [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:08 am
Giles, like Buck v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 2:57 pm
Diaz v Karim [2017] EWHC 595 (QB) The schedule of special damages – never straightforward. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 2:01 pm
Specifically, the DWP argued that the FTT (a) They had applied the wrong test for justification (b) They had not followed the decision of the Court of Appeal in R(MA and Others) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2014] PTSR 584. [read post]
13 Aug 2016, 2:55 pm
£250 for the poor state of the property on readmission. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 3:05 pm
Osman, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Harrow (2017) EWHC 274 (Admin) A challenge to Harrow’s allocation policy, specifically on the ‘downgrading’ of allocation priority for overcrowded households in PRS accommodation, while existing Harrow tenants kept the higher priority for overcrowding on a transfer application. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 6:15 am
Giles. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 4:43 pm
Adopting this view would mean walking back from Giles v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 11:03 am
Johns Law School and New York Law School, All rights reserved [lawprofessors.typepad.com]Giles v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 7:00 am
Giles, et al. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 2:28 pm
There are some paragraphs of a general nature on a local authority’s responsibilities when considering or arranging out of borough (or more distant) temporary accommodation, drawing on the Supreme Court judgment in Nzolameso v Westminster City Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another intervening) [2015] UKSC 22 (our report). [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:27 am
(Did everyone notice the line-up in Jones v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 1:00 am
At §24, Neuberger J points us towards Secretary of State for Trade and Industry –v- Langridge [1991] Ch. 402, where Balcombe LJ provided a four-question approach: What is the scope and purpose of the Act? [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 11:16 am
In Giles v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Giles v. [read post]
