Search for: "State v. Gill" Results 41 - 60 of 690
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am by Eleonora Rosati
The end result of that litigation was that both parties agreed there was a contract between them and that it was governed by the law of the state of Pennsylvania (where it had been litigated). [read post]
9 May 2021, 9:00 am by Magdaleen Jooste
The recent case of Claydon v Mzuri is a particularly harsh example of the application of the prior use case law. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 6:09 am by Neil Wilkof
Kat friend Ian Gill reports on how miniscule trademark use may be enough to support a passing off claim and maintain a EU trademark registration. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
("[B]y asking for a preliminary injunction, the plaintiffs seek to enjoin Gill from making statements that have not yet been found to be unprotected. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 3:42 am by Neil Wilkof
Kat friend Ian Gill reports on a recent cautionary tale from the UK. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
Investigative website Open Democracy uncovered details of the Cabinet Office during  months of research for a report on the state of Freedom of Information. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Vasileía tou Theoú, (South Dakota Law Review, Vol. 65, No. 2, 2020).Brian Owsley, Is The Supreme Court Irrational: Trump v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
On 12 November 2020 Warby J handed down judgment in the case of Ameyaw v McGoldrick [2020] EWHC 3035 (QB). [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:06 am by Jane Turner
Gill stated that working hard was her way of coping with PTSD. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:25 am by Sophie Corke
Murphy, Austrian Supreme Court revisits football screening in pubs | Dutch State not liable for incorrect interpretation of private copying exception, says Hague Court of Appeal | West African Cotton Company Limited v Hozelock Exel: How may a petitioner establish lack of novelty of a registered design in Nigeria? [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Steyn J heard various applications in the case of Ameyaw v Goldrick. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 5:58 am by CMS
In this case comment, Stephen McNaught, Mark McMurray, Josh Risso-Gill and Gael Hardie, who all work within the planning team at CMS, comment on the decision recently handed down by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of Dill v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and another [2020] UKSC 20, which concerned “listed buildings”. [read post]