Search for: "State v. Gluck" Results 1 - 20 of 94
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2010, 8:51 am by Lawrence Solum
Gluck (Columbia University - Columbia Law School) has posted Consensus Textualism: States as Statutory Interpretation Laboratories (Yale Law Journal, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 1:29 pm
Federal courts sitting in diversity are “extremely cautious” about recognizing innovative theories under state law (Combs v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 7:52 am by Rick Hasen
Among the items in the new issue: Imperfect Statutes, Imperfect Courts: Understanding Congress’s Plan in the Era of Unorthodox Lawmaking by Abbe Gluck Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 6:27 am
 Yale’s Abbe Gluck, writing in Politico last week, invoked Gregory v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 3:35 pm by Michael Steven Green
Yet another un- or underexplored question about Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:15 pm by Guest Blogger
The federalism argument has been made in two important Supreme Court amicus curiae briefs, one submitted on behalf of 22 states and the District of Columbia, and another on behalf of four law professors – Abbe Gluck, Gillian Metzger, Thomas Merrill, and Nicholas Bagley.The federalism argument is based on the doctrine of Pennhurst State Hospital v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 7:10 am
by Michael DorfIn my latest Verdict column I explain the pros and cons of the three main ways in which the SCOTUS could rule for the government in King v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 1:37 pm by Robert Ambrogi
The answer will likely depend on the law of the state where the accident occurs. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:23 pm
Burwell – A Reply to Abbe Gluck – a textual analysis of the PPACA and response to a prominent advocate for the government’s position. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 10:24 am
On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States ("SCOTUS") decided the 5-4 landmark decision, Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:27 am by Rick Hills
The most appropriate limit on Congress' enumerated powers was stated 193 years ago by Chief Justice John Marshall in McCulloch v. [read post]