Search for: "State v. Godfrey" Results 1 - 20 of 93
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2020, 1:13 am by CMS
It was a misdirection to say one needed to broadly compensate each individual. 1209: Ms Demetriou QC says it is clear that the Tribunal saw there as being a governing principle that individual claimants must be restored to position they would have been in but for the infringement, which is wrong as a matter of statutory construction. 1202: Ms Demetriou QC states that the compensatory principle is not irrelevant at distribution stage, but it is not a statutory requirement. [read post]
13 May 2020, 1:02 am by CMS
Please refresh the UKSC Blog homepage throughout the day in order to get the latest posts. 15:58: Mr Harris QC suggests this is an appropriate place to finish for the day and the Justices agree. 15:54: Citing the Canadian Supreme Court case of Godfrey, Mr Harris QC says the court referred there to Microsoft. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
United States The Atlantic had a piece “The True Danger of the Trump Campaign’s Defamation Lawsuits”. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-421 Filed: December 27, 2018 ALICE KIMBLE, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 7:26 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Godfrey v.Eames, 68 U.S. 317, 326 (1863); see also Sticker Indus.,405 F.2d at 93 (stating that “each application in a longchain grows out of the one immediately preceding it”). [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Godfrey, 2017 BCCA 302 (37810) Should this Competition Act class action be certified. [read post]