Search for: "State v. Goodstein" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2020, 6:34 pm
There were three votes only for a single result: reverse Judge Goodstein’s judgment. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 1:20 pm
It is logically impossible to derive any legal result from the five opinions other than that three of the Justices (including the one now disqualified) voted to reverse the trial court's judgment.So Judge Goodstein's judgment awarding the property is now reversed. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:31 pm by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
SHELLEY GOODSTEIN, as Conservator for BLAKE GOODSTEIN and CHANDLER GOODSTEIN, and GRANT GOODSTEIN, 4th DCA, Case No. 4D18-2382 (January 9, 2019)Follow @crubincrubin [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 10:35 am
Here are the conclusions to each of the three opinions agreeing that Judge Goodstein's judgment below should be reversed:Pleicones, J. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 10:24 am
Here are the conclusions to each of the three opinions agreeing that Judge Goodstein's judgment below should be reversed:Pleicones, J. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:41 am
Before the oral arguments yesterday in The Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 7:09 am
(How they succeeded in pulling off that strategy will be the subject of my following post.)For ECUSA and its attorneys, the world of church property law began and ended with Watson v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 8:46 am
In 2009 that Court handed down its decision in the case of All Saints Parish Waccamaw v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 2:25 pm
This case came to trial against the background of the South Carolina Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in All Saints Waccamaw Parish v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 7:34 am
Note: The stated purpose was as quoted, until the Charter was amended in 2012 -- see below.] [read post]